Despite the common perception, at the time of launching the first symphonic piece, Rahmaninoff’ s talent exposed to the critical cynicism that was being questioned on the fact of his musical skills, it survived… but needed the time to recover.
The historical analysis revealed that those negative words were the direct representatives of political and operational circumstances. The rivalry between the Moscow and St. Petersburg Conservatories was extremely strong at the late 19th century and the conductor who was responsible for a successful performance was not being fully aware of his role (he was drunk).
At the time when Rachmaninoff’ s talent had been presented to the public for the very first time, facing the excruciating criticism, the musician was absolutely ensured in the perception supported by media that he was the one to blame for his musical incompetence.
The result of which was a four-year depression stripped off any signs of creativeness. His self-confidence was being restored after therapy sessions and a total renewal of thoughts, beliefs, and perceptions of his own capabilities and talents. The time had come for Second Piano Concerto being born. Five years later after consistent steps towards building blocks of courage to write another symphony, his Second Symphony, was being composed (1906-1907). Winning the coveted Glinka Prize, an extremely prestigious award at the time, Rachmaninoff’s talent finally received a deserved level of recognition… this time not only talent was being awarded… but the composer’s determination, and self-belief built on grounds of criticism.